Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rao Samaj Villages in India


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 00:00, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Rao Samaj Villages in India

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely incoherent. With a lead para of "Rao Samaj has taken up a mission to become a visionary to the Indian societies since the inception of human development. Rao Samaj is playing key role in following and maintaining Indian Tradition & Culture. People of Rao Samaj has been participating to provide well-education, Hinduism rite, Hinduism civilization and the art of living life to people and saving tradition of Rajput dynasty", it's not even possible to tell what the subject of the article is. The rest of the article is just a list of villages and the one reference is to a page with the list of villages in Hindi. Brainy J ~ ✿ ~ ( talk ) 19:30, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   Brainy J  ~ ✿ ~ ( talk ) 19:46, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:05, 2 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - It's unclear if this a person or an organisation. It's so badly written, that it might not be a person or an organisation.  It's not sourced.  My own search turns up a mish mash of results that provide no clue.  If this subject is notable (whatever this subject may be), then we would need to start from scratch anyways. -- Whpq (talk) 16:38, 7 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per A7 Delete. I can't even figure out what it's supposed to be from the blurb at http://raosamaj.com/Home.aspx, but I suppose we can't speedy it because we don't know if it is an organization or some cultural thing. Doesn't sound like it's a person. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:26, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I think this is a list of villages with a significant number of people with the name 'Rao' or a related ancestry. Probably some bloke trying to do genealogy.  With that suspicion, I also found this Rao_(surname), by the same author.  I'm not going to propose deletion of that (thought it might be worth it), because that might be justification for a sitewide purge of surname pages, which I'm not willing to commit to, but there you go.  If there was a source I would say merge, but I guess it's just junk data. romnempire (talk) 23:20, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.