Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rape of a live-in partner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  06:40, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Rape of a live-in partner

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Basically a rehash of a newspaper article. A sad story but WP:NOTNEWSPAPER.  Yinta n  21:16, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete There is only one source for the events related in this article, and even assuming true these events do not possess the requisite notability for inclusion in an encyclopedia. Since both of the parties referred to are minors, it is unlikely that they will ever be identified or that further publicity will emerge to indicate how the case was resolved. In effect, this article is of no more value to the enclopedia's readers than a story in a tabloid newspaper. Lastly, the title does not describe the article, since the article does not discuss the phenomenon (which has occurred and will occur in the future throughout the world), only a specific case reported in one Indian newspaper.  General Ization  Talk   22:34, 23 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Retain It is strange that (1) the parents of a minor girl allow her to stay away from home for a year, with or without knowing that she is having a live in relationship . (2) The girl endures such trouble for one year before deciding to return home. It is a strange phenomenon considering Indian social norms, and hence these events do possess the requisite notability for inclusion in an encyclopedia. Since police and POCSO are roped in, the outcome of the case will give insight into the changes occuring in Indian society. So this article's value to the enclopedia's readers is more than the value of a story in a tabloid newspaper. It is premature to say whether further publicity will emerge to indicate how the case was resolved.  There is only one source for the events related in this article, but Deccan Chronicle is a reputed newspaper and less likely to publish false news.    Allsfasle (talk) 12:01, 24 September 2016 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allsfasle (talk • contribs) 11:42, 24 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - Don't see how an ordinary crime should get its own article, and even if it should, then the title needs to be changed. AlphaBetaGamma DeltaEpsilonZeta 13:42, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:03, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:03, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:03, 25 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: WP:NOTNEWS. Anup   [Talk]  18:56, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TNT. Even if everything is true, the page itself is a mess. Bearian (talk) 20:51, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: WP:NOTNEWSPAPER. Pratyush (talk) 16:58, 30 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.