Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RapidXml


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 12:13, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

RapidXml

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm not finding references that support the notability of this product Mikeblas (talk) 04:26, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Q VVERTYVS  (hm?) 10:57, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment: this does seem to be a popular product, but the best I can find in terms of sources is a book that contains tutorial-style information on how to use this library and a short summary of what it is. I'm not sure if that would be considered in-depth coverage. Otherwise, it's all blogs and trivial mentions. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 11:01, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for now as there was certainly time for improvement since starting in 2007 but as the best my searches were only some News, Books and browsers links, there's nothing for a more obvious keep. SwisterTwister   talk  07:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:05, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Assuming it will get big later is not justification to keep currently. It seems kind of small potatoes, and even the big names don't often get much coverage. DreamGuy (talk) 19:29, 27 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.