Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rapid Eye Movement (REM) sleep Behavior Disorder Screening Questionnaire (RBDSQ)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. After two relistings, it would have been nice if there was more participation here. Closing as keep per the two "keep or merge" !votes below, which is the general (albeit weak due to lack of participation) consensus in this short discussion. Also, both !votes in the discussion have countered the notion in the nomination that the sources in the article lack an indication of notability for the topic. A merge discussion can continue on an article talk page if so desired. (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica1000 07:36, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Rapid Eye Movement (REM) sleep Behavior Disorder Screening Questionnaire (RBDSQ)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

References don't seem to indicate notability, nor does the article text itself; having "the potential to be useful" does not indicate notability.  Iago Qnsi  (talk) 22:50, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 24 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:08, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Keep or Merge into Rapid eye movement behavior disorder - There are 4 sources in the article that are specifically about it. At the very least, if notability is still questioned, it is well documented and important enough to be merged. - Sidelight 12 Talk 12:53, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The article was tagged for deletion 2 minutes into its creation, that suggests no effort was put into researching if sources could be found. I realize the article was not developed as it is now, and it had one article solely about this questionnaire, and another supporting reference. - Sidelight 12 Talk
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 08:26, 8 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep or Merge into Rapid eye movement behavior disorder - Agree with the above. Notability seems like it's there, but unclear if it should have its own article at this point. --&mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  |  15:21, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.