Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rapid T. Rabbit and Friends


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 03:34, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Rapid T. Rabbit and Friends

 * – ( View AfD View log )

De-prodded with promise of "sources", but all of the sources added are just YouTube links or a wiki about the furry fandom. Absolutely zero reliable sourcing found anywhere. Does not seem to be a notable show as it only aired on access TV in one market Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:05, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:05, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:05, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

This is one of the longest running shows, if the THE LONGEST running show in public access TV history. This isn't a page that needs to be deleted, it needs to be finished to Wiki standards. The creator of the show also created this wiki back in 2008, and passed away in 2017. His friends are working to bring this page up to snuff and do it justice. Simply deleting it has no merit. There's legit history here and a story to tell, it just takes time to put together and cite the references because a lot of it was newspaper published. The internet wasn't a huge thing back when the show ran in it's heydays, so give us some time to get this done. Monkiedude22 (talk) 16:16, 17 September 2021 (UTC) Monkiedude22  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * — Monkiedude22 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:39, 21 September 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Passes WP:SIGCOV. Particularly notable is which has in depth coverage on the show in relation to an exhibition on the program at the Museum of the Moving Image. Another quality source with significant coverage is .  The Wall Street Journal article also commented on the continuing popularity of the character at Furry Fandom conventions; and this source confirms that on page 172. Best.4meter4 (talk) 02:35, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:06, 29 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.