Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rapid fans


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:03, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Rapid fans

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This seems to be a recreation of an article that was draftified in 2022, so I think AfD might be a better venue the second time around. I'm not seeing any signifigant coverage that the fanbase of a football team are independantly notable in their own right. Maybe if there's enough well-sourced content there could be a section about the fanbase in the team's article? Clovermoss 🍀 (talk) 09:06, 1 July 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Merge? Redirect? Delete? Further consensus needs to be gathered here on a way forward. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The SandDoctor  Talk 17:20, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Romania.  Clovermoss 🍀  (talk) 09:06, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:08, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable, and current name could refer to any number of clubs. GiantSnowman 12:32, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge or Redirect to CS Rapid București, does not appear to meet GNG on its own, reads like an article copy pasted from google translate. Would be better as a redirect, or best as an abridged section in the article for the corresponding club. IceBergYYC (talk) 01:55, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * In regards to the merge or redirect comment above, I'm not sure if there's anything realistically salvageable about this article that would make a merge meaningful. I'm willing to be convinced otherwise. As for a redirect in itself... I agree with the first commenter that "Rapid fans" is vague enough to have many possible meanings. Clovermoss 🍀  (talk) 22:59, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect seems wrong, given that the leading results on Googling "Rapid fans" are for a Rapid Vienna fan group! Nothing about Rapid Bucharest. --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:07, 10 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete I just can't find anything in the article (or the concept) that justifies being included in WP under the notability guidelines. Joyous! Noise! 15:34, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as the term is too ambiguous to be appropriately affiliated with just a single football club or fan group. Furthermore, as per nom statement, I fail to see how a club's fanbase can be outright independently notable of the club itself; in this case at least, there is no evidence of that being the case. Bungle (talk • contribs) 07:36, 15 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.