Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rapido Realismo Kali (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:50, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Rapido Realismo Kali
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

A poor article which shouldn't have escaped deletion the first time it has poor notability and lacking in sufficient sources to justify a solo article like the first nomination Dwanyewest (talk) 21:04, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  — Janggeom (talk) 14:54, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete This art is referenced in several issues of the FMA Digest. However, when I looked at one of the articles it gave the location and class schedules for schools offering this art.  That doesn't look like independent coverage to me.  The magazine itself says "ideas and opinions expressed in this digest are those of the authors ... and are not necessarily the views of the publisher or editor."  That makes me question the magazine's editorial oversight. Papaursa (talk) 00:50, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per verifiability issues as detailed above. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  01:35, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks independent coverage that shows notability. Astudent0 (talk) 14:39, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.