Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rapier Instructors


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 08:28, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Rapier Instructors

 * — (View AfD)

Probably not uncontroversial enough for a prod but this article is as close as you can get to Wikipedia becoming the Yellow Pages. Spam magnet to boot. Seems to have been spun-off the rapier article so maybe merge back but by all means cleanup. Pascal.Tesson 00:48, 9 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, maybe merge some salvageable things into the main article. But kill the list, definitely. -Amarkov blahedits 01:22, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, list of instructors can change and the text is non notable.  B e  a  rly  541  01:29, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. - 70.105.138.175 01:36, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. If they has articles I'd suggest this be a category, but seeing as how that's not the case I'll stick with the deletion. -- Wizardman 01:55, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - yep, reads like the Net/Yellow Pages SkierRMH 02:16, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all.-- Dakota 04:31, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. MER-C 04:44, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable. TSO1D 14:26, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable and per nom. &mdash; Seadog 16:39, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and don't merge. If their are notable rapier instructors, recreate as a "List of notable rapier instructors" ---J.S (T/C) 18:14, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Baristarim 19:50, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a directory, a merge would probably be pointless.-- danntm T C 04:27, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP is not a directory. James086Talk 13:29, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete mainly because most of the information - ie. list of schools is still duplicated in the original article.Peter Rehse 10:21, 12 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.