Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rapper Manny (Punjabi Rapper)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 10:08, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Rapper Manny (Punjabi Rapper)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

This seems to be a promotional autobiographical article by a minimally notable musician. He has had a little airplay and gets the odd passing mention but I don't see significant coverage by reliable sources which would support an article. Much of it is unverifiable, as is often the case when somebody writes about themselves. This article has been tagged as problematic for a while and I don't think there is any hope for it. DanielRigal (talk) 21:25, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 18:53, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 18:53, 27 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 11 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete not seeing anything here that would pass our music guidelines. Maybe someday.. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  01:46, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lacks independent coverage. Airplay is short of national rotation. Nothing notable. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:27, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, lacks reliable third-party sources, the provided reference to BBC Asian Network doesn't appear to meet WP:BAND 1. Non-notable.  Also serious issues with the tone and content of the article leading to concerns over COI. ✤ Fosse 8 ✤ talk 14:52, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.