Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raptivity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )  08:01, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Raptivity

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:GNG. Available sources in various internet searches consist of routine coverage, passing mentions, public relations content and directory listings. North America1000 01:36, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:37, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:37, 10 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. I checked the sources listed in the article and several that looked promising no longer have any content regarding Raptivity at all at the URLs cited 5 years ago. Others consisted of 90% press release, 5% passing mention and 5% irrelevant content. I'll take North America's word on sources not already cited. A shame, "Raptivity" is a cool name. — GrammarFascist  contribs talk 16:56, 12 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Do not Delete. I think it is a useful article on elearning authoring. The tool is out in the market for long and so to be fair if the links are not updated, we should ask the community to support on updating it or ask the author of the article to help. But, deleting the post for the links not having latest information would not be right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poonamj (talk • contribs) 06:59, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Poonamj is right, deleting because the links not having latest information would be wrong. So I checked, and found that this subject does not pass the General notability Guidelines. L3X1 (distænt write)   )evidence(  01:50, 18 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.