Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raptor Rehabilitation of Kentucky, Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jenks24 (talk) 11:11, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Raptor Rehabilitation of Kentucky, Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This appears to fall short of the notability requirement in WP:NONPROFIT that says non-profits are notable if they are national in scale. This appears to focus on activities in one state, Kentucky. Batard0 (talk) 07:17, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 11 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:11, 19 October 2012 (UTC)




 * Weak delete The nomination mis-interpreted policy at a few levels. But wp:notability-suitable sourcing appears to fall just short. North8000 (talk) 11:05, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
 * On what levels have I misinterpreted policy? I'd add that it fails WP:GNG if that's what you're after, --Batard0 (talk) 13:54, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Gongshow  Talk 03:28, 26 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - I started leaning towards keep while reading this whas11.com link which mentions the group is "the state’s largest bird of prey rehab center". However, I started leaning towards delete because I've found mostly event listings but nothing substantial such as the history (aside from its 1990 foundation). Unfortunately, Google Books provided nothing substantial either. My news results showed they have appeared at several events and are obviously a noble cause but an article can't only focus with that. SwisterTwister   talk  21:37, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.