Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rapyd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 23:35, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Rapyd

 * – ( View AfD View log )

moved by contributor from draft space, but it remains a promotional article that fails NCORP. Thissort of editing is typically COI.  DGG ( talk ) 06:23, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep I have nothing to do with the company, nor with the Wise Guys. I'm just editing articles about topics that are interesting to me. I read about Rapyd on TechCrunch, so I decided to create an article. Tell me what exactly does not meet the criteria of significance, and what is advertising? I edited dozens of different articles and saw their quality and improved them as much as possible. You can see from my contribution that I am on the contrary trying to make the articles appropriate for Wikipedia and add authoritative sources.--Condiwiki (talk) 15:51, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * WP:CORP and WP:CORPDEPTH, which lists criteria for notability, and also a list of criteria that don't connote notability - which the references section of this article closely resembles. What are the three best references that clearly connote notability per the guidelines? - David Gerard (talk) 19:23, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment There are some links as examples which prove the notability and importance of the company.
 * https://techcrunch.com/2019/12/03/rapyd-which-offers-fintech-as-a-service-via-a-single-api-adds-20m-more-to-its-coffers-at-a-1-2b-valuation/
 * https://techcrunch.com/2019/02/13/rapyd-nabs-40m-led-by-stripe-and-gc-for-fintech-as-a-service-a-single-api-for-payments-money-transfer-and-more/
 * https://techcrunch.com/2021/01/13/rapyd-raises-300m-on-a-2-5b-valuation-to-boost-its-fintech-as-a-service-api/
 * https://venturebeat.com/2019/02/13/rapyd-raises-40-million-to-expand-its-payments-network-worldwide/
 * https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/israeli-fintech-company-rapyd-raises-300-million-655305
 * --Condiwiki (talk) 09:27, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Those are all fundraising rounds, which are not considered sufficient to avoid deletion. See "Numerical facts" section of WP:CORP, which I referred you to above. If that's really the best you have, you're making the case for this article to be deleted - David Gerard (talk) 10:55, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:02, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:02, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - coverage is literally press releases, slightly churned press releases, and funding rounds (which don't connote notability). WP:REFBOMBing does not convince - David Gerard (talk) 19:23, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:31, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:31, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per . Seems a pretty good example of what, per WP:NORG, isn't good sourcing. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 00:32, 23 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.