Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raq-C


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to KXOL-FM.  MBisanz  talk 00:34, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Raq-C

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines, and lacks any third-party reliable sources. SudoGhost 07:43, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 7 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:24, 9 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete no significant claims of notability here. I'm not finding significant coverage in 3rd party sources.--RadioFan (talk) 15:57, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to KXOL-FM, as was done earlier today by User:The1Originator. I don't know that the case is there for individual notability - yet! - but her name is certainly a reasonable search term. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 20:03, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Unless we have a major policy violation, we should not simply redirect an article during the ongoing AFD. We best wait, allow editors to see if the article content is improvable, and then redirect if such is the decision at the end of discussion. While a redirect might well be the outcome, with respects to User:The1Originator and for the sake of proper examination by others, I am rolling back the well-meant redirect for the duration of this discussion.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:40, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Expanded search parameters:
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.