Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rare Songs (Katy Perry)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. BJ Talk 00:58, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Rare Songs (Katy Perry)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Bad article title (no idea who deemed these "rare") but hardly an artist that requires a "songography". Fails WP:NOT. - eo (talk) 00:24, 5 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Aside from falling under a few WP:NOT categories, is almost certainly destined to be someone's POV (same argument as the other list). Cheers, CP 00:38, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Not part of a catalog album, digital release or even a concert freebie, this is an extraneous list without a purpose.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 01:28, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete indiscriminate list of songs that aren't on an album. Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 04:30, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:NPOV issue calling these songs rare. Katy Perry is does not have a substantial enough catalogue, nor has she achieved the longstanding fame or scholarly interest to justify an examination of unreleased works, unlike Elvis or the Beatles. No objection to a paragraph being added to the main article with maybe a couple of examples, since we at least have a source here (for some of these). But that's about as far as I can see this going, at least until she achieves Madonna-level longevity. 23skidoo (talk) 06:56, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:47, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:47, 5 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete A fine example of not following NOPV. Wikipedia is not a list of indiscriminate/useless information. Red  Thunder  12:04, 5 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.