Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rare witch project


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. Owen&times; &#9742;  04:29, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

Rare witch project
Not notable, advertisement, doesn't meet WP:Web, vanity Dbchip 17:46, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete looks like advertising to me, certainly nn. Gimboid13 20:20, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, advertising. But I removed the speedy tag because advertising is, alas, not a speedy criterion. --Angr (t·c) 21:19, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Renata3 23:04, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Izehar 21:04, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Better not delete or else they might hack wikipedia! LOL. Zordrac 11:28, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, although I do like the "ahem this is not advertisment just info" at the bottom of the page. -Parallel or Together ? 11:33, 1 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.