Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rashed Khamis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 02:48, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Rashed Khamis

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG. No significant sourcing found online via WP:BEFORE in English or Arabic (stub on ar-wiki). No significant coverage in sources on page. Iseult  Δx parlez moi 01:33, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: can someone please confirm why football/soccer is not covered specifically at NSPORT, one of the most popular sports in the world? Yet there are specific criteria for curling and MMA? I tend to avoid football AFDs for this reason, is there a football/soccer specific criteria for those players who do not need general notability but have played for a national league? MaxnaCarta (talk) 03:44, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
 * See WP:NSPORTS2022 for the most recent RfC on the subject; WP:NFOOTY is deprecated as a result of removing participation-based criteria. Iseult   Δx parlez moi 05:33, 21 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football,  and United Arab Emirates. –– FormalDude   talk  07:49, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with MaxnaCarta and avoid football AfDs for precisely the same reason - that and the ardent pile-on you get when you argue that one appearance for Wigan is not notability. Having waded through the links shared by Iseult I am none the wiser. However, by any standard, Rashed with one appearance for Hatta fails WP:GNG, let alone WP:SPORTSPERSON. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:59, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
 * essentially, all footballers must pass WP:GNG on their own merits, and the arguments by appearances are no longer valid as of April. Iseult   Δx parlez moi 15:38, 21 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete - Having reviewed the consensus discussions regarding sport notability, I am more confident in submitting a comment on this AFD. GNG does not apply as there is not significant coverage by multiple reliable and independent sources either in the article or elsewhere. No hits in the library, nothing appropriate on Google, Newspapers, or wayback. Consensus is that there needs to be at least one significant source. Not seeing it. Happy to change my submission if anyone finds proper sourcing elsewhere. MaxnaCarta (talk) 02:11, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 19:30, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:43, 22 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.