Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rashi Yadav


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:08, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Rashi Yadav

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not yet notable WP:NMODEL: has participated in several beauty pageants, but not won any. Only passing mentions in reliable sources. Already speedy deleted twice. Little Will (talk) 20:39, 16 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Meets neither WP:GNG nor WP:NMODEL. Being merely a contestant in Miss Earth India is insufficient for WP:ANYBIO. ubiquity (talk) 21:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:45, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:45, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:45, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:45, 16 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable pageant candidate.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:45, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete : Doesn't meet WP:GNG or any other notability criteria. Anup   [Talk]  05:00, 17 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - it's best to delete this article right now. If this person becomes notable in the future, then the article can be recreated Thank You CyberBrinda (comment) 10:09, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: Doesn't even make it on a list to disqualify under WP:GNG. From the article: "She took part in Miss Diva 2015 pageant and could not make it to the top 7. As of September 2016, she is currently selected as a finalist of Miss Earth India 2016 pageant.", so there is less notability than Pankhuri Gidwani. I can sympathize with you wanting to keep this article but there has to be a line somewhere, or no line at all, which is chaos. "If" the subject wins "Miss Earth India", and not just places, which I assume would be Miss Earth India 2016, out of the other 80 or 90 contestants, and there is more notability, you can request the article be reinstated by an admin. A better solution would be to create articles under current WP:policies and guidelines like Verifiability (policy) that includes Verifiability (a policy section), Identifying reliable sources (content guideline) instead of inundating Wikipedia with articles that should be in another article, or articles that do not currently belong on Wikipedia at all. Reliable secondary sources is a criteria for inclusion by establishing notability to ensure the Reliability of Wikipedia. We need to continually build an encyclopedia based on these principles, that are reflected as the Five pillars, and not on personal likes or dislikes or what "might" happen in the future. Otr500 (talk) 17:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Yes, I myself have already voted it for deletion and I have mentioned the same thing that you have said above. User:CyberBrinda (comment) 11:34, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Participating in a pageant unfortunately is not a credible claim of significance. We have seen recently that winners of USA state pageants have been redirected to the event articles per WP:BIO1E. Over here, there is no claim of a win, so this is an unambiguous delete. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:53, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable Pratyush (talk) 09:12, 22 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.