Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rashid Adewumi Aderinoye


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. While the !votes are numerically even, the "delete" !voters have made no attempt to rebut the arguments of the "keep" !voters. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:10, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Rashid Adewumi Aderinoye

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article contains zero sources, it's unencyclopedic in nature and it appears that the article author has a personal relationship to the subject. Ibn Daud (talk) 21:14, 6 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:09, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:09, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:09, 6 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. The eubject fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. He lacks coverage in reliable secondary sources. A Google search of him only brings up papers written in his honor.  Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 13:56, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable academic.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:14, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete — Per rationale provided by . A before I conducted doesn’t show any evidence of notability. Celestina007 (talk) 19:06, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Is not notable, does not have enough coverage. Nika2020 (talk) 13:14, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Clearly passes WP:ACADEMIC by a wide margin by it satisfying WP:PROF as the subject was appointed as the Executive Secretary of National Commission for Nomadic Education 1 and also WP:PROF being a member of the apogee academy of Education in Nigeria: "Nigerian Academy of Education" 2, also WP:PROF. The subject also reaffirms the community discussion in a recent RfC. Lastly the nominator nominated the article for deletion at eactly 8 minutes later after it was published while the author was still working on it which was too hasty i think. – Kaizenify (talk) 08:54, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep: Per, as subject meet atleast one criteria of WP:NPROF enough to meet our inclusion criteria. Korebabs (talk) 11:56, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 16:38, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep This article clearly passed this General Notability Guidelines, take a look at what the nomitor said, and see the reason behind the nomination, he stated "The article contains zero sources...." imagine! I don't know why some editors in Wikipedia are curious to nominate article for deletion, instead of sticking to the basics rules provided, before nominating an article for deletion, see whether the article have independent sources, so that it can be improve, and you are expected to do or leave it to some editors to do so, an article can not be completely sourced at once, it requires time, now how many references have you seen in the article? and per which deletion criteria are you suggesting the deletion? He/She quickly suggest deletion per no reference, now references are provided, what then? per which criteria again? time is still yours to strike your words.
 * Also, he stated "it's unencyclopedic in nature...." How do you expect it to be encyclopedic when you tagged it at exactly 8 minutes after the article was created, why can't you wait and see after some days, now when it is completed tell me, is it encyclopedic?
 * Let me make this clear, some editors are not expose to Nigerian educational affairs or the current affairs, and they will jump to it negatively, voting delete due to what they feel like the academic person or the sources are not reliable, this user User:Kaizenify  clearly put a concrete evidence into the table, per his evidence, per the article was not tag base on a specific deletion criteria, per the nominator goes ahead of the line, tagging before completion, at exactly 8 minutes after the page was created, that shows no any willingness in him to improve or let someone to improve, I strongly urge Keeping this article, it will be a legacy for the next Nigerian generation to come.  An@ss_koko(speak up)  23:03, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Note to closing administrator. All of the “delete votes” are only based on the nominator wrong information about the subject and not about the present article form. Also none of the delete votes have showed how the subject here fails wp:NPROF. Kaizenify (talk) 20:19, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   10:20, 22 June 2020 (UTC) *Speedy Keep. The subject satisfies WP:BASICS, WP:GNG and WP:ACADEMIC. The subject belongs to the body of the highest level of academics (Nigeria Academy of Education) and held key Nigerian national positions in education. A look at some of the sources in the article prove the subject's notability, for instance sources number 2 [],8 [],13[], 15 [] with other sources backing this article, it's a speedy keep. Ugbedeg (talk) 13:26, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment — Struck out !vote from sock puppet above. Celestina007 (talk) 14:57, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, per rationals by Kaizenify and <b style="color:#00BFFF">An@ss_koko</b>. Em-mustapha talk  11:34, 25 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.