Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rashmi Misra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America1000 03:02, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Rashmi Misra

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional bio  DGG ( talk ) 05:50, 27 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. Sources check out and show notability. If you think the tone of an article is promotional please edit it to remove the slant. Egaoblai (talk) 07:55, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 13:28, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 13:28, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Sources are not independent, reliable sources and are almost entirely PR pieces. So notability is an issue here., are from apparent non-notable organizations;, are interviews (in non-notable sources);  is her organization's website;  is a promotional bio for a talk she gave. --regentspark (comment) 21:26, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  A  Train talk 07:28, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:58, 3 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete per RegentsPark above, there is no significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. GSS (talk |c|em ) 17:20, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete-What RP said. ~ Winged Blades Godric 05:23, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - Poor sourcing and very promotional. --  Dane talk  02:39, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - I failed to find coverage in reliable sources. Subject fails GNG. Pratyush (talk) 07:59, 8 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.