Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rasmuffin Productions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. This is sufficiently obvious that it doesn't need more time to decide, and it looks like leaving it open will only cause more unproductive discussion. Friday (talk) 21:35, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Rasmuffin Productions
Page created to promote someone's animation website. As often happens, makes its own best argument for non-notability: "It is currently the home to only three flash cartoons, but the creator is expanding the site." Daniel Case 03:54, 27 January 2006 (UTC) *Keep Article is special User:WebGeek 04:48, 27 January 2006 (UTC) *Strong delete. I've stricken the above "keep" vote for fraudulent signing. This article is only special in a short bus kind of way. --Aaron 15:59, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't meet WP:WEB creator on talk page all but admits its self promotion... which wikipedia is not. --W.marsh 03:57, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete clearly not a significant website, to quote the author "it is currently home to only three flash cartoons --SeanMcG 04:07, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete can't argue with the article. Ruby 04:48, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * User:WebGeek does not exist, previous post by 71.199.6.186 -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 06:46, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Soooo special! Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:52, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per SeanMcG -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 06:46, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. Sockpuppeting is one thing.  Pitiful attempts at sockpuppeting are worse.  Powers 14:39, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete Fails WP:WEB by a mile. No Alexa rank.  One of the lamer sockpuppeting attempts in recent memory. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:52, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Upgrading my vote per Rasmuffin's antics below. --Aaron 18:48, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Jerks!!! All Jerks!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.173.159.62 (talk • contribs) 13:06, January 27, 2006

Definition of Jerk: An ignorant wikipedia admin who pokes fun at persons with mental disabilities. As quoted by Aaron: "This article is only special in a short bus kind of way." This is not the level of professionalism one would expect from an organization of the magnitude of wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rasmuffin (talk • contribs) 13:21, January 27, 2006

Don't any of you admins have lives? I mean, do you just sit around all day dissing on people's articles or something? Get a real job! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rasmuffin (talk • contribs) 13:22, January 27, 2006


 * Comment. Since Rasmuffin and 206.173.159.62 couldn't be bothered to sign their comments (and I'm being generous in presuming they're two separate people), I've helpfully done so for them. In addition, due to their childishness, I've changed my vote above to Speedy Delete. --Aaron 18:48, 27 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Addendum to above: Rasmuffin's further "arguments" for keeping the article, from its talk page:


 * 4. I love Rasmuffin productions


 * 5. I will be so mad if anyone takes this article off!!!óŰøö 


 * 6. You'll feel bad when the site is making tons of money and they give you no donations.


 * 7. W.Marsh should be nice and let it stay. He will be my favorite person if he does!


 * BJAODN or not? Daniel Case 20:03, 27 January 2006 (UTC)


 * That's a particularly fascinating use of diacritical marks. It may just cause me to rethink this entire AfD! Or not. --Aaron 20:23, 27 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.