Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raspberry (color)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was KEEP. -Splash talk 17:54, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

Raspberry (color)
All of the colour articles were subject to a blanket AfD here. This was closed as a delete all, although the talk page for that AfD was tabulated otherwise. VfU opted to undelete all the articles and give them seperate AfDs (see the bottom of VfU for my reasoning on this). So here they are. If you wish to make a blanket comment on these articles please copy paste your comment into each &mdash; do not expect the closer to extrapolate your intent in these exceptional circumstances. Thank you. No comment from me. -Splash talk 00:04, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Prince's headwear preferences. -- BD2412 talk 00:37, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per BD2412. Capitalistroadster 01:34, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per BD2412, if for no other reason than his fine work on this matter, which earns him deference from me. Xoloz 05:30, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Raspberry, which does mention what color they usually are. The Prince Raspberry Beret bit is one sentence and can be covered there; it hardly merits keeping a separate article for that. Jonathunder 06:44, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, because the song is about the color not the fruit. Kappa 07:06, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - as per BD2412. --Cel e stianpower hablamé 08:26, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep but slay the infobox of unverfied info --TimPope 16:41, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per BD2412. --Optichan 19:58, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. See my arguments for fire engine red as they also apply here (though I suppose not to the same extent in the case of songs). --Jacquelyn Marie 21:40, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, marginally sourced. Sliggy 12:13, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge/redirect. -Sean Curtin 00:09, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.