Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raspberry Software


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. W.marsh 22:19, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Raspberry Software

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Company described doesn't appear to be notable, and nothing links to it. No significant followup to notability template added several weeks ago. Seems to promote the company in question, but nothing else Cralar 21:47, 15 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep - I interpret it as satisfying WP:CORP (1), due to the coverage received from winning the Anglian Business Awards, as well as coverage of their products in PDA magazines; But I would say that, as I created the article (NB I am not affiliated with them in any way) -- Ratarsed 21:47, 19 January 2007 (UTC)


 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks,  Nish kid 64  19:59, 20 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak delete as they are just short of notability. Local business award is nice but there are so many of those if we started we'd never finish. The one independent review from a strong source is PocketNow's. Most other hits are press releases or simple product announcements or links to download the software. --Dhartung | Talk 00:09, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. I found a short blurb from Pocketpcmag.com.  If you add up the award and the reviews, it's borderline.  So, I default to weak keep.--Kubigula (talk) 21:57, 27 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.