Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rassemblement pour l'action municipale


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  13:27, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Rassemblement pour l'action municipale

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a political party at the municipal (i.e. city) level, which accomplished nothing of any notable consequence and has no reliable source coverage to clear WP:ORGDEPTH. They ran slates of candidates in two consecutive elections, but managed to elect only one councillor who then left the party to sit as an independent just one month after the election -- and the only "source" cited here is a private conversation with the city's own communications staff. Something like this is not guaranteed a Wikipedia article just because it existed, if its record of accomplishment is this insignificant and its sourceability is this weak -- we would need real media coverage about it to justify keeping an article. Bearcat (talk) 14:57, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:58, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:58, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:32, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   00:17, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete The only source available being a personal communication means that this is unverifiable, and therefore violates the core content policies. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:48, 8 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.