Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rassool Auckbaraullee


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. as copyright violation/G12 JForget  23:54, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Rassool Auckbaraullee

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No indication that this self-published author is notable by Wikipedia's criteria. Prod contested by IP. ... disco spinster   talk  14:46, 10 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - interesting, but no indication of relevance McMarcoP (talk) 15:38, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Can't find any ISBN numbers which is the basic criteria of notability for books PanydThe muffin is not subtle 17:18, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - No sources are given, and a simple Google search provides only flimsy evidence at best. I agree that this page does not meet Wikipedia's notability criteria. edwardchelski 19:55, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, copyvio from http://www.booksie.com/rauckee. This is the third time that Rassool has created this copyright violation, and has yet to explain how, even if it weren't a copyvio, he would be notable.  See Articles for deletion/Rassool Russell Auckbaraullee and .  Rassool Russell Auckbaraullee  got salted to prevent recreation, so he recreated it at this title.  It's been deleted at this title three times already.  It's time for some User blocking.  Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 21:25, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.