Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rat Capone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Kurykh  03:51, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Rat Capone

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unnotable character of the Chip 'n Dale Rescue Rangers series. Originally proposed merge to the main article, but character is not notable enough for mention as he only appears in two episodes out of 65. Fails WP:FICT. This is a failed WP:PROD (contested even though he was never mentioned on the main article anyway and this page was only really linked to from the template which is up for CfD). Collectonian (talk) 08:10, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletions.   —Quasirandom (talk) 16:24, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose Nominator claims to have debated this on the main Chip 'n Dale talk page, but is really just throwing down fiat. As the article creator, I stated that I de-prodded the article because I felt it would be OK to just merge it. Fact that it was never mentioned on the main article does not justify this AfD, as a completed merger would have remedied that. If Collectonian really cared about making articles better, there are other less drastic ways of calling attention to this short of AfD. Wl219 (talk) 19:47, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Um, I did not claim to have debated this on the main talk page so please don't put words in my mouth. I said it was a failed PROD, as in it was PRODed, and the PROD removed (by you). As I said on the talk page, I originally suggested a merge, but after further consideration, realized Rat Capone just isn't notable enough for mention except in the episode summaries.  Collectonian (talk) 19:50, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - It does not contain real world information, and it certainly doesn't assert the possibility for it. TTN (talk) 21:48, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable plot exposition wholly devoid of any reliable sourcing. As for merging, it would only seem appropriate for any given episodic articles, should they themselves meet the muster of WP:EPISODE.  —   pd_THOR  undefined | 22:16, 9 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.