Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rated people


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:28, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Rated people

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly sourced, mainly to their own website, non notable and written like an advert. Theroadislong (talk) 12:58, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   FITINDIA   14:34, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.   FITINDIA   14:34, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.   FITINDIA   14:34, 16 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: Can't find any third party sources that fails GNG and NWEB overall. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:39, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  00:40, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  00:40, 17 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as self-cited spam, with copy such as: "Their aim is to inspire homeowners to create a home they love, by removing the stress of finding quality local tradespeople!" K.e.coffman (talk) 17:34, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * delete fails GNG. not quite G11Dlohcierekim (talk) 07:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete indeed, seems just advertising for a local service, not notable (yet?). W Nowicki (talk) 17:30, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Seems to be a UK version of Angie's List. Footnotes showing not sufficient for a GNG pass and running down the first 100 responses of a Google query generated zero sources counting towards GNG. The number of Google hits indicates that there is a possibility of several sound sources being out there, however, so ping me if anybody actually finds them and I will flip my recoomendation on this piece. Carrite (talk) 13:10, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing ++ 17:08, 19 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.