Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rational Asset Manager


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 08:56, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Rational Asset Manager

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable. There are no independent sources Jcarlosmartins (talk) 09:28, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  10:57, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:54, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:00, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - I could not find any Wikipedia acceptable source. It seems like this is a non-notable article. Jcarlosmartins (talk) 10:33, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * You cannot vote twice in an AFD, your nom is your vote. Praxidicae (talk) 14:38, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Struck double !vote. -- The SandDoctor Talk 06:46, 15 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:SIGCOV. The links are nine pages form the developer's website and a blog. Bearian (talk) 17:14, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete it's an IBM (subsidiary) product that exists and that IBM talks about, but there's no substantial independent coverage. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 05:13, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as it currently lacks the depth of coverage required by WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. -- The SandDoctor Talk 06:47, 15 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.