Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ratman (Dungeons & Dragons)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 20:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Ratman (Dungeons & Dragons)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete. The article admits that this creature is a fan creation rather than a creature from any published or official source. Sean Curtin 01:40, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom, and per lack of sourcing. I'll alert the people at WP:D&D, too, to get their opinion.  Cool Blue  talk to me 01:48, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I suggest we consider Keeping it. Ratmen have found their way back into official D&D canon: See here. It urgently needs clarification and better referencing because (I suspect) we are talking about something notable here (inasmuch as D&D monsters are ever notable), but the text of the article can be interpreted to mean that it is a fan creation. BreathingMeat 03:06, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Unless we start allowing D&D stats in articles like Zoophilia, List of Pokémon, and List of Neopets, Delete. I don't want there to be a Dungeons & Dragons monsters test on the level that Pokémon has had. -Jeske ( v^_^v ) 03:24, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete- per nom and above.  Wikidudeman  (talk) 04:35, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - Lacks any notability whatsoever, and not even cited. Makes a pretty big claim, I'm pretty sure the concept of "Rat People" has been around a bit longer than D&D, lets say, oh, a good few thousand years of Chinese Mythology.Piuro 05:51, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fan-fiction, and not in any official products. Unverifiable. Sjakkalle (Check!)  06:39, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per the article: "Ratman is not an official D&D creature". Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:16, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above.  Gan fon  16:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per all.  Buck  ets  ofg  23:04, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Andre (talk) 02:19, 4 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.