Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RauteMusik.FM


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus, default to keep. Review if you wish. Non admin closure. Giggy Talk 07:20, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

RauteMusik.FM

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable internet radio. References in the article are only the stations own website and their press release. The talkpage (and the company website) have a press coverage links which in all cases are trivial coverage of RauteMusik.FM as part of wider reporting - mainly the change of legislation regarding license fees and how operators (including RM) were affected. Agathoclea 09:33, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

And so it is not relevanced? RauteMusik.FM is in Germany/Europe like DI.FM in the USA/World. One of the biggest internetradios stations. There are also a few internetradio stations on the wikipedia, so why not RauteMusik.FM? Keep it!--Chuckeh 10:41, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Delete no evidence of notability presented. --Fredrick day 10:59, 15 August 2007 (UTC) Keep RauteMusik.FM does exist in Germany and Europe. A local company notable in its own country and not worldwide doesn't mean it lacks the notibility. Rather than referring it to lack of notabilty, help to improve the article as a stub. Cocoma 13:05, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletions.   -- Agathoclea 17:08, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Existence is not notability.  Needs references in English. Vegaswikian 02:47, 19 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Just read the discussion's page. You can find RauteMusik.FM in all the big media players like iTunes, Windows Media Player and so on! And NO, not every radio station is listed there, especially on iTunes there is no other german radio station!--Chuckeh 12:08, 19 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep referenced and contrary to popular opinion, there is no requirement for English language references. Nuttah68 12:01, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * yes but there is a requirement that sources say more than "this exists". --Fredrick day 12:19, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * You never read the discussions page correctly or said anything to it? There are a lot of references and you can see on the streamstats a lot of listeners, more than on 80 % of other webradios of the world. So?!--Chuckeh 17:46, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.