Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rav Vadgama


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:REFUND applies.  So Why  12:15, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Rav Vadgama

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:JOURNALIST and can't seem to find reliable sources the subject in question does not seem to pass basic GNG  FITINDIA   20:12, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  00:38, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  00:45, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  00:45, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:01, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Jupitus Smart  17:10, 4 June 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: Google shows lots of passing mentions but no in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources that could satisfy general notability guideline. It looks WP:TOOSOON. GSS (talk |c|em ) 19:52, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  07:52, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete lacks sufficient coverage in RS to meet GNG.Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:55, 20 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.