Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravi Puravankara


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. clpo13(talk) 18:34, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Ravi Puravankara

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:ANYBIO. Nothing apart from routine trivial announcements, PR-stuff and non-intellectually-independent interviews. &#x222F; WBG converse 17:49, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  &#x222F; WBG converse 17:50, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  &#x222F; WBG converse 17:50, 21 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete routine businessperson BIO; being the 94th wealthiest Indian (with access to PR agents untroubled by ethics considerations?) does not qualify; WP is not a list of wealthy people. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:58, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as a case of WP:PROMO with suspicions of undeclared paid editing, borderline G11, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 19:13, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable, run of the mill business person. One mention (#96) in a list article does not establish the subject's notability.--SamHolt6 (talk) 00:07, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. The fact that he is quite wealthy, while insufficient evidence on its own, will tend to suggest there will be coverage about him, even if, due to our lack of understanding of Hindi, we struggle to find it. However, there is some that we can find that while not sufficient to prove notability hints that there are things out there. See here, for him appointing his son to a position he held. With that said, he doesn't seem to be present on the Indian Wikipedia, and an article about his company was recently rejected in draft space; in the end, I have to conclude the delete is probably the right thing to do. --  No COBOL  (talk) 13:25, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Atlantic306. PlotHelpful (talk) 15:49, 27 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.