Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravinder Kaur


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  essay  // 23:18, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Ravinder Kaur

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not a very notable person. Does not seem to pass WP:PROF on the basis of publications, position, or influence. She has mentions in the press, but all of them are one-liners that either mention her as an associate professor and cite one sentence, or they mention her as a member of that Telangana panel--but there is no in-depth discussion of her or her significance. Drmies (talk) 18:45, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Extra, extra: a statement from Kaur and another committee member have raised a bit of dust in the Indian media--see the (few) relevant hits in this Google News search. In my opinion, that does not bring her up to GNG level. Drmies (talk) 18:47, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:PROF and WP:N. Rabbabodrool (talk) 16:13, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. May have GS cites of 29, 25,16. 16..(?). Not enough yet. Too early. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:46, 25 January 2011 (UTC).
 * Delete. I'm prepared to believe that a full professor at IIT Delhi may well pass WP:PROF, despite the lack of evidence. But we don't have enough reliable sources that say anything nontrivial about her to write anything in an article here about her. Pretty much the only thing the sources actually say is that she's a professor and a committee member. That's not enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:20, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.