Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravindra Khattree


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Mz7 (talk) 02:28, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Ravindra Khattree

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not fulfill Notability. Article is autobiographical and was originally created by User:Khattree (user also frequently contributed to the article), and all but one reference is from the Oakland University website, and such referencing could be fulfilled by almost any professor at almost any university. Some edits also from Oakland University IP addresses. W IKIPEE  DIO  15:24, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:21, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:21, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:21, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:22, 21 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. Subject's h-index is not quite up to the usual standards, but the books with 428 and 280 citations are probably enough to meet WP:PROF. Nom does not provide any valid deletion criteria. -- 101.117.9.24 (talk) 14:45, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't think the journal he edits (J. Stat. Appl.) is sufficiently well-established for WP:PROF, but his selection as fellow of the ASA should be enough for #C3. The ASA's guidelines say they only select 1/3 of 1% of their membership as fellows per year, which I think should be selective enough, and ASA is certainly a major scholarly society. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:19, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. GS h-index of 14 passes WP:Prof for mathematics. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:04, 21 March 2014 (UTC).
 * Keep. >200 citations in mostly single or 2-author papers and mostly in math/stats journals. Agricola44 (talk) 23:09, 21 March 2014 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.