Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravipalli


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Discussion over the best transliterated spelling can continue on the article's Talk page. Owen&times; &#9742;  00:39, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Ravipalli

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No sources cited. Multiple attempts at finding sources (other than a map) have failed. Avishai11 (talk) 20:47, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Asia and India. Avishai11 (talk) 20:47, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:53, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Andhra Pradesh-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:53, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
 * delete - no evidence of existence provided. - Altenmann >talk 21:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I agree. Avishai11 (talk) 12:39, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GEOLAND, appears to be a populated place. Didn't quickly find much in English because it looks like it's also spelled Ravupalli, mentioned here - a town of 5,000 should easily be notable so the census should be checked. SportingFlyer  T · C  22:59, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
 * It's not a town in the 2011 Census. And it didn't have 5,000 people.  AP has been redistricted now, but  (page 382) this was Ravupalle village in the Garugubilli mandal of Vizianagaram district with a population of 2,978.  Uncle G (talk) 06:28, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Town or village definitional specifics aside, still a very sizeable place to be arguing over at AfD. It seems the issue here is that it gets transliterated in many different ways, not that it's not notable... SportingFlyer  T · C  09:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @SportingFlyer I checked for over 2 and 1/2 hours, and could not find ANY SOURCES, other than: a map (provided by google), and the 2011 census. These are NOT enough sources to go on. Avishai11 (talk) 12:39, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * That's not the test here though. It's clear from the census, maps, and the occasional mention in an article that it can be WP:Verified, which is really all WP:GEOLAND requires. SportingFlyer  T · C  14:56, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GEOLAND and SportingFlyer. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:20, 30 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.