Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravipudi Venkatadri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus defaulting to Keep and w/o prejudice to a future renomination. The sole Keep !vote cited no policy or guideline but in the absence of any other participation after two relists, it's time to move on. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:29, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Ravipudi Venkatadri

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No independent evidence of notability either in the article or based on a Google search. Only hits are on his own books, which only means that he wants to be notable, not that he is notable. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:44, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 17:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 17:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 17:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Atheism-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 17:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 17:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 17:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep. Some notability apparent. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:30, 28 May 2017 (UTC).

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:18, 5 June 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:25, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.