Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raw Food Made Easy for 1 or 2 People


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:12, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Raw Food Made Easy for 1 or 2 People

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Procedural nom to get consensus after a disputed PROD followed by multiple other attempts at PROD all for same concern: insufficient notability. DMacks (talk) 22:40, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
 * There has been no substantive improvement in the article in this regard since the original. Pinging previous PRODders: Lear's Fool, Joereddington, Alexbrn. DMacks (talk) 22:45, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 01:25, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 01:25, 17 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Doesn't meet WP:NBOOK. Alexbrn (talk) 07:40, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete and I'm surprised to see this book in Template:Veganism and vegetarianism, who adds an arguably non-notable cookbook to a nav template? valereee (talk) 11:57, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - No reliable, independent sources used in the article and the Book Publishing Company does not seem to meet our criteria for an independent publishing house. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:29, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails NBOOK. Britishfinance (talk) 13:50, 17 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment Note SPA creation of this and related articles by User talk:Ekelly7 and User talk:Edeubel valereee (talk) 14:34, 17 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination this expanded blurb before the check clears. -The Gnome (talk) 15:42, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Piling on - no independent sourcing about the book in the article, can't find any non-UGC reviews - fails NBOOK. Girth Summit  (blether)  17:50, 23 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.