Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rawle Allicock


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. J04n(talk page) 00:00, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Rawle Allicock

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. No significant coverage in reliable sources to show this person is indeed worth having an article on. The article is really totally unsourced as well, and no reliable sources exist. OGBranniff (talk) 05:25, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete There's a lack of sources online, and while I'm sure he could beat me at chess, being 72nd in the UK isn't really good enough to establish notability. English draughts is a minority game with nothing like the coverage of chess, and I don't think his achievement there (even if properly referenced) would make him notable. We need in-depth reliable sources to avoid deletion. --Colapeninsula (talk) 16:14, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Who really cares if someone is 72nd in the UK at chess? I mean, this is chess, not hockey. Hockey is a rather popular sport, however, on SportsCentre you very rarely see chess highlights. Now, if someone was 1st in the UK, then matters would be different. But being 72nd in the UK at chess isn't very notable. Delete. MTG1989 (talk) 21:22, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Yeah. 72nd isn't high on the list. He doesn't seem notable enough to me based on the information. ''' NeoJustin ( Talk page ) 16:12, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 2 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete -- obviously NN. He may achive something one day, and he can have an artiocle then.  Peterkingiron (talk) 14:38, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Sasata (talk) 16:42, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.