Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Chew (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Ray Chew
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

WP:BIO not notable Alan  -  talk  01:06, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:06, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:BIO - has two good sources already, and more could be found easily. Bearian (talk) 04:16, 18 March 2010 (UTC) There are over 70,000 Ghits to sort through, of which at least a few have to be good. Bearian (talk) 04:19, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Google news turns up lots of good stuff, see this search which is loaded with in-depth reliable source material. Several articles are behind paywalls or registration walls, but from just the abstracts its obvious that on the first page alone there are half a dozen or so unique sources that could be used to expand the current article, covering a wide range of subjects relating to his life.  That the current article is essentially a stub isn't relevent here, due dilligence by the nominator would have turned up enough to establish that the article could be expanded with plenty of reliable, independent, and indepth sources.  -- Jayron  32  17:47, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Snow/speedy keep. Per the above sources.  Agree that it is incumbent upon nom to do a pre-nom check before bringing silly stuff like this.--Epeefleche (talk) 08:17, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.