Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Cowdery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 14:29, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Ray Cowdery

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article was dePRODed by creator without addressing the issue(s). Concern was: ''Insufficient sources to establish notability per WP:CREATIVE. Amazon is not a WP:RS. Authors' own works are not acceptable as notability sources.'' Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:45, 16 April 2018 (UTC) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:45, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 02:43, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 02:43, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 02:43, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 02:43, 16 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. No evidence of significant coverage. Neutralitytalk 04:37, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't pass GNG. Doesn't pass WP:AUTHOR - I do not see significant coverage of the works, and the citation counts of his works are in the single digits per title on scholar.Icewhiz (talk) 06:45, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Retain. Author has eighteen non-fiction books in paper print; and six WP articles cite his works (Jan Kubiš, Jozef Gabčík, Nazi architecture, Operation Anthropoid, Reich Chancellery, Willys MB)
 * I would like to cite Wikipedia: Pillar no. 5: No firm rules — Spirit must matter more than strict adherence to the letter of the law. The Fifth Pillar even goes sofar as to link directly to the Ignore all rules Policy: "If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it.


 * In my opinion, Wikipedia as a whole benefits more from keeping the article, than losing it. --GeeTeeBee (talk) 08:47, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Funny — when I engaged to the fundraising appeal banner, to make a donation yesterday, the page displayed this quote from Jimbo Wales: "Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet has free access to the sum of all knowledge."
 * Somehow doesn't sound like he cares more about criteria than about information to me ?? --GeeTeeBee (talk) 14:26, 18 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete: does not meet WP:NAUTHOR & significant RS coverage not found. The number of books is not material; they appear to be published with small-time publishers; I'm unable to find any reviews. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:56, 18 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.