Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Diaz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 21:56, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Ray Diaz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:PERP not met. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 20:02, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 20:02, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:06, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:06, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:06, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:08, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:08, 12 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. A biography of one arrest that fails WP:BLP1E. I can't find evidence of independent notability as a social media "influencer" to satisfy WP:ENT.  Most important, this is a WP:BLPCRIME violation with no biographical depth. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 13 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per Gene93k....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:19, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per the argument of Gene93k Mujinga (talk) 22:17, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - not really independently notable outside of a couple of incidents. We're not a police blotter. Bearian (talk) 18:30, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - No significant coverage. Barca (talk) 13:24, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete there are so many violations of wikipedia policies in this Earnsthearthrob (talk) 18:25, 19 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.