Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray K Iles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure)  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   11:46, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Ray K Iles

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not seeing sufficient evidence of notability. And it reads like spam. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:53, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   21:56, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   21:57, 16 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. GS h-index of 27 in very highly cited field (with lots of coauthors) just passes WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:30, 16 April 2017 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:23, 23 April 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * delete tries to hang N on the company but N is not inherited. Jytdog (talk) 04:45, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * weak keep per Xxanthippe Dloh cierekim  00:39, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 02:45, 1 May 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 12:32, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam: "... a medical diagnostics company developing new, rapid, robust and affordable diagnostic tests...". Wikipedia is not a web host for company's promotional materials. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:21, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Fails GNG, and article is lousy (not as much as Naziism in US, tho) but per Xxanthippe.  d.g. L3X1  (distant write)  18:34, 10 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.