Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Kuka


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Icewedge (talk) 21:54, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Ray Kuka

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:BIO, no sources. PROD was removed. — Snigbrook 19:11, 5 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. JBsupreme (talk) 19:15, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete no assertion of importance or significance. Drawn Some (talk) 19:23, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject. The subject of the article fails this basic requirement of notability. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk | Sign 19:58, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Article doesn't seem to meed standards for notability due to not being mentioned in reliable sources. Gaia Octavia makes a good point here.  tempo di valse  [☎]  20:59, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 6 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\talk 02:28, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, no reliable sources available to confirm this person's notability. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:27, 6 May 2009 (UTC).
 * Delete: Non-notable person. Iowateen (talk) 23:51, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BIO. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 05:37, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.