Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Mumford


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 02:18, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Ray Mumford

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can see nothing to indicate that this person is notable by our standards. Most of the article is unsourced (and gravely unencyclopaedic too – "one of the most innovative airbrush artists in the world"?). The existing sources are: a mention in a description of a picture; a forum post; and a blog post. I can find nothing relevant in Gbooks or Gnews. Web search suggests that there was a noted British fisherman by this name. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:13, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 03:49, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 03:49, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 03:49, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete my own search also indicates that the facts may be airbrushed here... as in there is no notability, as there are basically no sources available.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 03:47, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 01:51, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as there are no adequate sources to support notability. Mccapra (talk) 07:20, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Sources don't qualify for WP:BIO criteria. OhNo itsJamie Talk 13:58, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Could not find any independent sources that would support notability (not even one). Britishfinance (talk) 18:11, 11 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.