Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Stow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Closed a bit early due to WP:SNOW.  Jamie ☆ S93  16:28, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Ray Stow

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable person. Fails WP:BIO and the basic criteria. Google returns nothing, as does Google news. Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 14:56, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I suspect a hoax. a little   insignificant  15:16, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree, this looks like a hoax, and I can't find any sources either. Cazort (talk) 15:41, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: A hoax. Iowateen (talk) 16:16, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: as hoax and WP:Complete Bollocks. Eddie.willers (talk) 02:06, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable, but did you guys actually look at the web search? He does apparently exist, according to his own website, so it's not a hoax (or if it is, someone has waaaaaayyyy too much time on their hands), but he's miles away from notable, as this was the only weblink on him. Nosleep  break my slumber 03:53, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as I first tagged this. Not even close to notable. Maybe not a hoax, but who cares? - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:01, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Being an academic does not confer noteworthiness any more than being a plumber does. Hairhorn (talk) 19:27, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —David Eppstein (talk) 05:43, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not a hoax, but passes neither WP:PROF nor WP:BIO. The article says that the subject “is a fervent detractor of Gordon Brown”, among other things. Being a fervent detractor of whomever only confers notability to someone if others listen, and I am not talking about a few students in the subject's classes only.--Eric Yurken (talk) 00:57, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.