Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rayat London College Club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 14:49, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Rayat London College Club

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non notable organization - speedy deleted this morning and recreated by the original editor noq (talk) 18:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm the nominator of the first version, the article doesn't meet the citeria for organizations and websites. 4 Google hits with the only source - Wikipedia. This is a clear candidate for speedy deletion. Note to the creator of the article: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and included sujects should be notable. I've informed you properly about rules at this website, just check the links. I'm sorry, and good luck with your project. --Vejvančický (talk) 21:38, 29 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete I don't believe that the article's content even qualifies as a credible claim of significance, so A7.--Talain (talk) 21:58, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

If its still not notable what changes shall I make to keep it on wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.239.13.98 (talk) 22:37, 29 June 2009 (UTC) Keep Its an active club with a hough potential to grow, it is no only notable national (RLC existing and potential students) it is also notable for international students and potential students as RLC (Rayat London College) is part of the Rayat group which runs education business not only in UK but in India with number of colleges. Rayat-Bahara Group webssite —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.239.13.98 (talk) 13:15, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment If you becomes notable in the future, then the article can simply be recreated once independent and reliable verification of notability is possible, even if it is deleted now.--Talain (talk) 22:44, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:13, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:13, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. If the club's "in its growth stage" it is almost certainly non-notable. Wikipedia is for articles that are notable now, not articles that someone thinks will be notable (and, to be honest, most college clubs will never be remotely notable). Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 06:48, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:CLUB. Looks more like an attempt to gain facebook fans than anything else. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:25, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no coverage to establish notability and the article itself is promotional in nature. -- Whpq (talk) 16:30, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Then you probably want to read the guidelines for notability of clubs and why arguments like "huge potential to grow" carry no weight. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 22:04, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.