Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raydesk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 11:22, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Raydesk

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I declined the speedy deletion request on this but it nonetheless appears to be lacking coverage in reliable sources and be overly promotional in tone and intent (although, I think, not sufficiently so to speedy delete). CIreland (talk) 14:10, 17 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. I'm not sure why the speedy was declined, but there's really no assertion of notability and no apparent reliable coverage.  jæs (talk)  17:32, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Because articles about software are not eligible for A7 speedy deletion. CIreland (talk) 19:05, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Based on the promotional edits to desktop virtualization by the author, I initially mistook the article for being about the "Stickfish Raydesk" software company, as opposed to just the "Raydesk" software product. In any event, the only mentions I can find — for either the company or the software — are one or two wire press releases (and a bunch of duplicates).  jæs (talk)  22:52, 17 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable software. -- Nuujinn (talk) 23:57, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. Lacks independent coverage for now. Pcap ping  00:43, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, notability hasn't been shown. Emily Jensen (talk) 04:25, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Outback the koala (talk) 07:57, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.