Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymark


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  23:56, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Raymark

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is a company therefore WP:NCORP applies. I am unable to locate any deep or significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability as they rely entirely on PR and company announcements.  HighKing++ 14:26, 11 October 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:29, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Software,  and Canada.  HighKing++ 14:26, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. I also find little more than PR about this company.  FalconK (talk) 20:56, 22 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.