Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond Cambefort


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 04:24, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Raymond Cambefort

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence that this is a notable bio. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:45, 31 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Let's see... He wasn't even a supercentenarian (i.e. didn't even reach 110). The French government doesn't recognize him as a WW1 infantryman. Even if he were, he wasn't the oldest infantryman, just one of the last to die. And the one (one!) source in the article, which is in French, is marked . EEng (talk) 00:50, 1 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence of meeting WP:N's requirement of non-trivial coverage in multiple, reliable third-party sources. Even if he did, it could be argued that any encyclopedic information could be included elsewhere, on one of the many longevity-related lists. Canadian   Paul  17:23, 1 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete No significant coverage in reliable sources. David in DC (talk) 16:23, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- AustralianRupert (talk) 08:14, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 4 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as my searches found nothing better and I'm not seeing a good move target aside from the articles where he's mentioned; I'm also inviting former PRODder . SwisterTwister   talk  05:01, 5 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.