Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond Dean


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) buffbills7701 21:27, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Raymond Dean

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY. Seems to be promotion by WP:Single-purpose account. Boleyn (talk) 12:06, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 26 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. Clear pass of WP:PROF and (per GS citation count) possible pass of #C1. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:04, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Eppstein. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:40, 26 December 2013 (UTC).

''5. The person holds or has held a named chair appointment or "Distinguished Professor" appointment at a major institution of higher education and research (or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon). Criterion 5 can be applied reliably only for persons who are tenured at the full professor level, and not for junior faculty members with endowed appointments.'' ''Major institutions, for these purposes, are those that have a reputation for excellence or selectivity. Named chairs at other institutions are not necessarily sufficient to establish notability.''
 * Comment Here is C5:

My concerns about whether he meets C5 are: It needs to be a major institution...[with] a reputation for excellence or selectivity. I was unsure if Ball State met that. It also states that Criterion 5 can be applied reliably only for persons who are tenured at the full professor level and I couldn't find evidence that he has tenure. Boleyn (talk) 08:50, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Take a look at Ball State University. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:28, 29 December 2013 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.