Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond Emerson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:42, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Raymond Emerson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No notability on his own. Falls into the category of WP:INHERITED. Fails WP:GNG. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 03:38, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:06, 13 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as nom. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 01:10, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: it's not generally necessary to vote for your own nominations unless you wish to modify or withdraw the nomination. Fiachra10003 (talk) 15:46, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete This is a classic case of WP:INHERITED and failure of WP:GNG.--- ARTEST4ECHO(Talk) 13:31, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Emerson meets WP:GNG based on the following, just in the New York Times: LEAVES LABRADOR TO WED.; Amelia Forbes, Society Girl Nurse, to Marry Raymond Emerson. August 06, 1912; and this Concord Revives Tradition Of Emerson on School Board. February 14, 1926; and this Raymond Emerson, 90, Ex-Engineer And Grandson of Famed Essayist. Oct. 30, 1977.  I'm sure a little more work will generate further citations.  Fiachra10003 (talk) 15:46, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 01:27, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep As per the argument above from Fiachra10003.     WordSeventeen (talk) 03:52, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.